Most Popular Resources in "Science and Politics"
» Most popular resources on the site
» Most popular resources in "Science and Politics"
» Return to "Science and Politics"
» Most popular resources in "Science and Politics"
» Return to "Science and Politics"
-
The AAAS Leadership Seminar in Science and Technology Policy
- "The AAAS Leadership Seminar in Science and Technology Policy is a 'crash course' in science and technology (S ) policy, designed for those who need to know how S policy works. It is modeled after the highly acclaimed orientation program that AAAS provides for its new S Policy Fellows each fall, but distills the key material into 4 1/2 days instead of two weeks."
-
Science and Public Policy Articles
- Mark Nockleby, Ph.D. has developed an extremely large collection of website links and articles about science and public policy. He has been working on this project for many years.
-
Sure, It's Rocket Science, but Who Needs Scientists?
- New York Times , June 17, 2001. " [M]any scientists in the United States ... conclude that the current administration is uninterested in scientific research or its conclusions. " (Requires free registration)
-
Science: the Endless Frontier
- The ideas set out by Vannevar Bush's 1945 policy document have been the basis for US science policy for over 50 years.
-
House Science Committee Democrats' Home Page
- Complete coverage of the activities of the Democrats in the House Science Committee, including press releases, speeches, bills under review, and other comomittee activities.
-
Bloated, Whiny and Self-Important
- Is the scientific bureaucracy the quintessential special-interest group? Scientific American, 9/01. A review by Keay Davidson of Daniel Greenberg's book, Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion . (Review reprinted on Amazon.com)
-
Science, Money, and Politics : Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion
- by Daniel S. Greenberg. From 9/01 Scientific American Review: " Dan Greenberg's profoundly important new book depicts American 'Big Science' as a classic self-perpetuating bureaucracy--bloated, whiny and self-important. This bureaucracy defends big (and sometimes indefensible) budgets by weaving scare stories about national scientific 'illiteracy,' questionable 'shortages' of scientific personnel, and imaginary threats from foreign competitors. Greenberg quotes an official of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget: 'With the possible exception of veterans, farmers, and college students, there is no group that squeals more loudly over a reduction of federal subsidies than scientists. They are the quintessential special interest group, and in effect, they make the oil industry look like a piker.' "
